THE HOWARD-WHITE #1 SAGA
Bill Goodwin, of the Tennessee Oil & Gas Association, praised Pryor Oil Company's quick action in containing the oil spill and minimizing the environmental impact. |
On Sunday, July 21, 2002 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency arrived in the person of Barbara Caprita, an EPA On Scene Coordinator (OSC). She promptly served a Notice of Federal Interest in the site. Shortly afterwards, following a meeting with the Boots & Coots supervisor (without Pryor's presence or input) she served Notice of Federal Assumption of the cleanup, declaring the Company's efforts to be "improper". Though Pryor requested an explanation of how its efforts had been improper, none was ever given. Having appropriated the well, she ordered all clean-up activities stopped (apparently, doing nothing was the proper thing to do), ordered all Pryor Oil's personnel and TOGA volunteers off the site, and drove off to check in to a motel 40 miles away. Pryor personnel and volunteers who had worked ceaselessly for more than 36 hours containing the incident were forced to stand helplessly idle while oil spewing from the well burned in excess of $15,000.00 an hour. What wasn't burned flowed onto the ground throughout the night, soaking into deep crevices that would ooze oil for months afterwards. Thus began the government sponsored Howard-White Circus Extravaganza. |
Barbara Caprita, On Scene Coordinator (OSC) Stunned disbelief when EPA's OSC orders containment and cleanup to stop and leaves for the night |
While the lucky contractors who got on the government tab were doing whatever they could to look busy, local residents and officials were aghast at the destruction wrought by the EPA. Damage from the oil and fire paled in comparison. The OSC, oblivious to anything other than the grand display of manpower at her disposal, exhibited her leadership skills by making everybody stop at periodic intervals to attend meetings. |
Yup, fire's out, guys. |
On Thursday, July 25, 2002 the fire was extinguished by the local volunteer fire department. It received no payment for doing so. Boots & Coots, which had been placed on the government payroll when the EPA took over the wellsite, was paid over $800,000.00. |
On Tuesday, October 15, 2002 Pryor Oil conducted an open flow gas deliverability test on the well. At the time, the well remained shut in with pressure at 520 p.s.i.g. The test showed the well capable of producing in excess of 5 million cubic feet of gas per day. As part of a plan to salvage the well and the millions of dollars worth of recoverable reserves of gas and oil that it had tapped into, Pryor Oil undertook construction of a new gas pipe line, despite intractable weather conditions and difficult terrain. The Company planned to complete the pipe line by the end of the year.
The EPA, however, had other plans for the well, and Pryor Oil was forced to file suit in Federal District Court to prevent the EPA from attempting to plug and destroy what was potentially the most prolific well in the history of the Eastern United States. Ultimately, Pryor had to sell the lease, and its other Tennessee properties, for legal fees. The government has now begun efforts to obtain reimbursement from Pryor Oil Company for the bloated waste perpetrated by OSC Barbara Caprita. Whether or not they succeed in putting the company out of business, maybe enough people will know the truth so the government lawyers saddled with the task will at least experience some discomfiture. And, if enough people are watching, maybe they'll even do the right thing.
And the damage to the environment? None, except for the EPA's terraforming of the pasture and woods, and a couple spoonfuls a month of nontoxic organic oil that leeches from crevices in the ground when it was allowed to soak in after the EPA stopped Pryor's clean-up and containment operations.
Is there any question why the United States is more dependent than ever on foreign oil? Is there any doubt the United States will be 100% dependent on foreign oil if the EPA has its way? Is there anything troubling in the fact that a Barbara Caprita can evict you and lock you out of your own property, without necessity of any court order or warrant? Is there anything troubling in the fact she can then spend millions of dollars destroying your property and you have no right to ask a court or even an administrative judge to stop her? Is there anything troubling in the fact that after she has taken your property and destroyed it your government can sue you for the millions of dollars she spent doing so, when anybody else could have done it for a few thousand dollars? Did you really think there was something in the Constitution that would protect you from any of this?